nanog mailing list archives
Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509.
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:04:37 +0700
On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:57 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Or unless you're running VTP
Yes, but this is evil and dangerous in a customer-facing environment; transparent mode is the preferred option, in most circumstances.
----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Sorry, sometimes I mistake your existential crises for technical insights. -- xkcd #625
Current thread:
- Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Peter George (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Roland Dobbins (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Jack Bates (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Roland Dobbins (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Roland Dobbins (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Sean Donelan (Aug 22)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 22)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 22)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Roland Dobbins (Aug 24)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 24)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Mike Bartz (Aug 25)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. David Hughes (Aug 26)