nanog mailing list archives
Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509.
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:13:47 +0100
On 22/08/2009 06:26, Andrew Parnell wrote:
The 67xx series cards aren't supported by the sup32, though. Would 65xx line cards do the trick?
unfortunately not:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SXF/native/configuration/guide/storm.html
• The following LAN switching modules do not support traffic storm control: – WS-X6148A-GE-45AF – WS-X6148A-GE-TX – WS-X6148-GE-45AF – WS-X6148-GE-TX – WS-X6148V-GE-TX – WS-X6548-GE-45AF – WS-X6548-GE-TX – WS-X6548V-GE-TX
Hmmm, expensive proposition to upgrade then - even though sup720 + ws-x67xx cards make a nice l2 platform for gig ethernet.
Nick
Current thread:
- Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Peter George (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Roland Dobbins (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Jack Bates (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Roland Dobbins (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Roland Dobbins (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Sean Donelan (Aug 22)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 22)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 22)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Roland Dobbins (Aug 24)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 24)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Mike Bartz (Aug 25)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. David Hughes (Aug 26)