nanog mailing list archives
Re: FTTH Active vs Passive
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 20:15:03 +0000
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 08:07:42PM +0000, James Bensley wrote:
I'm wondering why despite all this comparatively magical speed increase we have seen over the last decade, with 10 times better on the horizon, we the customer ever get a 1:1 speed ratio?
speed kills... actually, the killer here is PMTU... there is almost no way to effectively utilize the BW when the MTU is locked to 1500 bytes. --bill
-- Regards, James ;) Charles de Gaulle - "The better I get to know men, the more I find myself loving dogs." - http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/c/charles_de_gaulle.html
Current thread:
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive, (continued)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Byron Hicks (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Chris Adams (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Byron Hicks (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Chris Hills (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Michael Holstein (Dec 01)
- RE: FTTH Active vs Passive Deepak Jain (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive James Bensley (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive bmanning (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Will Clayton (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Fletcher Kittredge (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 02)
- RE: FTTH Active vs Passive Rod Beck (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Curtis Maurand (Dec 02)
- RE: FTTH Active vs Passive Mackinnon, Ian (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Curtis Maurand (Dec 02)