nanog mailing list archives
Re: FTTH Active vs Passive
From: Curtis Maurand <cmaurand () xyonet com>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:37:26 -0500
Mackinnon, Ian wrote:
In the US as well, but if you're trying to run a new fiber network and you want it uderground, the sewers in metro areas are a good place to start. In the rural areas, however, everything is on poles except for new construction where trenching and conduit are required.<snip> In the UK more homes have fixed wire telephony than mains sewers or water. Not sure what that means to this discussion :-)
I worked briefly for a small ILEC/CLEC here in Maine that does not replace copper trunks with copper any longer. If the copper goes bad, they're running FTTH.
Current thread:
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive, (continued)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive James Bensley (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive bmanning (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Will Clayton (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Fletcher Kittredge (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 02)
- RE: FTTH Active vs Passive Rod Beck (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Curtis Maurand (Dec 02)
- RE: FTTH Active vs Passive Mackinnon, Ian (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Curtis Maurand (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Michael Holstein (Dec 02)
- RE: FTTH Active vs Passive Holmes,David A (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Jack Bates (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Alexander Harrowell (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Delian Delchev (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Fletcher Kittredge (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Robert Mathews (OSIA) (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Randy Bush (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 02)