nanog mailing list archives

Re: RBN and it's spin-offs


From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:12:11 -0800

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Keith Medcalf <kmedcalf () dessus com> wrote:


Without a warrant, there is an absolute right to privacy.
It continues to exist right up until either (a) one party chooses
to give up that privacy or (b) a third party arrives with a Court
Order.  This is simply a covenant between two parties to preserve
that "private" state unless lawfully compelled by lawful process
otherwise.  In other words, a covenant to adhere to the rule of
law and the courts in the event of any dispute between the parties
or any third party.  It sure seems like a good thing to me -- and a
covenant I would hope anyone I do business adheres to.


That's funny.

You're assuming that the MLAT [1] process works -- it doesn't.

- - ferg

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_Legal_Assistance_Treaty

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)

wj8DBQFLPCSVq1pz9mNUZTMRAmtnAKCMrUkoeVmgHf+4z5/os5zfuVKLkwCgkE1G
cq4Iv0qlUZD6V6/txAPoh3Q=
=4RZt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


Current thread: