nanog mailing list archives

Re: RBN and it's spin-offs


From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:58:58 -0800

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes <tomb () byrneit net> wrote:


That's funny.

You're assuming that the MLAT [1] process works -- it doesn't.


He's also assuming that US on-shore law applies, which it doesn't when
any one party is a non-US person, at which point it passes to the real
of National Security.


Well, that's another issue entirely, but you are right. :-)

Unfortunately, folks in charge of "national security" with regards to cyber
issues don't realize that if that they can't stop sophisticated Eastern
European criminals from their ongoing pillage & plunder, they will *never*
stop determined attempts at critical infrastructure, espionage, etc.,
because they will simply use similar techniques.

This is serious stuff, and it is so damned pervasive, and happening right
in plain sight.

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)

wj8DBQFLPD2eq1pz9mNUZTMRAq7iAKCLDdKPRBp1EkrkIcQRG04pJZwmqgCfSA2k
jmEF+raHPkEGUsp6n5ZfgoI=
=UVPA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


Current thread: