nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISIS route summarization (it's a wrap)
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:28:59 -0600
People were nice to point out that my memory does function correctly, but I did receive a single suggestion to spark the fire back to life in my brain. The suggestion was ISIS for infrastructure only, and iBGP for carrying all customer routes, which will lower the ISIS costs during a state change and give aggregation abilities at any level (useful for IPv4 primarily while we finish up adding IPv6).
Thanks for the help. Life slowly returns to normal in Lone Grove, OK, but it's amazing how much a tornado takes out of you; even when it doesn't take your IP network down.
Jack Jack Bates wrote:
In a level2 only ISIS network (not using multiple areas due to MPLS limitations), is there a better method for handling aggregate routes than creating an aggregate and redistributing it into ISIS for each router? Primarily Cisco/Juniper based. Cisco I believe has an aggregate option in ISIS (similar to OSPF) and Juniper has a separate aggregate function which can be distributed into ISIS. Neither can do summarization per say unless they cross between levels; unless I'm mistaken.Offlist input is fine. Just trying to double check my brain while setting up IPv6 on the access edges.Link state does have it's limitations. ;) -Jack
Current thread:
- ISIS route summarization Jack Bates (Feb 23)
- RE: ISIS route summarization Ivan Pepelnjak (Feb 24)
- Re: ISIS route summarization (it's a wrap) Jack Bates (Feb 24)
- Illegal header length in BGP error Matthew Huff (Feb 24)
- Re: Illegal header length in BGP error Renaud RAKOTOMALALA (Feb 24)
- RE: Illegal header length in BGP error Matthew Huff (Feb 24)
- RE: Illegal header length in BGP error Mills, Charles (Feb 24)
- Re: Illegal header length in BGP error Paul Cosgrove (Feb 24)
- RE: Illegal header length in BGP error Matthew Huff (Feb 24)
- Illegal header length in BGP error Matthew Huff (Feb 24)