nanog mailing list archives
RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
From: Johnny Eriksson <bygg () cafax se>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:22:39 WET
"Paul Stewart" <pstewart () nexicomgroup net> wrote:
What reason could you possibly have to use non RFC 1918 space on a closed network? It's very bad practice - unfortunately I do see it done sometimes....
Really really LARGE scalability testing that needs more addresses than RFC1918 gives you. In a closed lab. Yes, it is ugly. Been there. Sometimes ugly can not be avoided.
Paul
--Johnny
Current thread:
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space, (continued)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Owen DeLong (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Nathan Ward (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Adrian Chadd (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Justin M. Streiner (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Jeroen Massar (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Soucy, Ray (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Stephen Sprunk (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Seth Mattinen (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skywing (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space David Barak (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Johnny Eriksson (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Michael Hallgren (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Roger Marquis (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space David Barak (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Johnny Eriksson (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Michael Hallgren (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Nathan Ward (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Randy Bush (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 02)