nanog mailing list archives
Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:25:40 +0900
Apart from the basic incompability here, my opinion of IPv6 is that it just gives you 2^96 more addresses to repeat all the old mistakes with.Not quite.. 2^96 = 79228162514264337593543950336 2^128-2^32 = 340282366920938463463374607427473244160
not quite. let's posit 42 devices on the average lan segment (ymmv). 42*(2^64) = 774763251095801167872 randy
Current thread:
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space, (continued)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space David Barak (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Johnny Eriksson (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Michael Hallgren (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Roger Marquis (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space David Barak (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Johnny Eriksson (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Michael Hallgren (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Nathan Ward (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Randy Bush (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Anthony Roberts (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Mark Andrews (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 03)
- IPv6 space (was: RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space ) Deepak Jain (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Stephen Sprunk (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Trey Darley (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Heather Schiller (Feb 03)