nanog mailing list archives
Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless
From: Eliot Lear <lear () cisco com>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:45:51 +0100
On 2/8/09 5:32 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Lastly, you've assumed that only a "smart phone" (not that the term is well defined) needs an IP address. I believe this is wrong. There are plenty of simpler phones (e.g. not a PDA, touch screen, read your e-mail thing) that can use cellular data to WEP browse, or to fetch things like ring tones. They use an IP on the network.
The term is ill defined, but the general connotation is that they will be supplanting dumb phones. So say what you will,phones with IP addresses is likely to increase as a percentage of the installed base. The only thing offsetting that is the indication that the U.S. is saturating on total # of cell phones, which is what that article says.
Moving on... Eliot
Current thread:
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless, (continued)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Paul Wall (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Christopher Morrow (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Tim Eberhard (Feb 07)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Martin Hannigan (Feb 07)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless James Hess (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Eliot Lear (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Joel Jaeggli (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Joel Esler (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Joel Jaeggli (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Leo Bicknell (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Alexander Harrowell (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Eliot Lear (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 08)
- RE: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Frank Bulk (Feb 08)
- RE: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Skywing (Feb 08)