nanog mailing list archives
Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless
From: Paul Wall <pauldotwall () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 01:08:54 -0500
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Aaron Glenn <aaron.glenn () gmail com> wrote:
NAT? why isn't Verizon 'It's the Network' Wireless using IPv6? <speaking-from-ass>there should be a FOIA-like method to see large allocation justifications</ass>
Probably because Verizon Business isn't using it, unless you count a couple of lab GRE tunnels. Drive Slow, Paul Wall
Current thread:
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless, (continued)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Martin Hannigan (Feb 09)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Matthias Leisi (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Chuck Anderson (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Dave Temkin (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Dave Temkin (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Scott Howard (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Paul Wall (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Paul Wall (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Christopher Morrow (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless James Hess (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Joel Jaeggli (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Joel Esler (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Alexander Harrowell (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Eliot Lear (Feb 08)