nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Confusion
From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:57:12 -1000
Mikael, On Feb 17, 2009, at 9:18 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
Suggestion: next time you buy equipment from competing vendors, tell the sales folk from the losing vendors that one deciding factor was (vendor or product) IPv6 support. That (and perhaps only that) will get their attention... :-)Well, considering how very few vendors actually support IPv6, it's hard to find proper competition.
You don't have to tell the truth to the losing sales folk... :-) Regards, -drc
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Confusion, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Jack Bates (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Justin Shore (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Adrian Chadd (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Kevin Oberman (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Stephen Sprunk (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Jeff S Wheeler (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Freedman (Feb 19)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Dave Pooser (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Justin Shore (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Michael Thomas (Feb 18)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 18)