nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Confusion


From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:18:17 +0100 (CET)

On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, David Conrad wrote:

Suggestion: next time you buy equipment from competing vendors, tell the sales folk from the losing vendors that one deciding factor was (vendor or product) IPv6 support. That (and perhaps only that) will get their attention... :-)

Well, considering how very few vendors actually support IPv6, it's hard to find proper competition. Even the companies who do support IPv6 very well in some products, not all their BUs do on their own products (you know who you are :P ).

I'm hopeful though, I see more and more references to IPv6 show up in product powerpoint presentations, so it's moving in the right direction.

If any CPE NAT box vendor comes around and has 6to4 with proper IPv6, I'll happily recommend all our customers who want IPv6 to buy that perticular box.

Apple Airport Extreme? (Seems to work, but I don't know how standards conformant it is)

Too expensive.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike () swm pp se


Current thread: