nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Confusion

From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:57:48 -0800

Leo Bicknell wrote:

I can't think of a single working
group chair/co-chair that's ever presented at NANOG and asked for
feedback.


Then were busy staring at your laptop and not watching the program.

If the IETF wants this to be a two way street actions would
speak louder than words.


In that I could not agree more.

Current thread:

Re: IPv6 Confusion, (continued)
- - - Re: IPv6 Confusion Aria Stewart (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Kevin Loch (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Leo Bicknell (Feb 18)
    - RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Adrian Chadd (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Joel Jaeggli (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Leo Bicknell (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion John Schnizlein (Feb 18)
    - RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Leo Bicknell (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Joel Jaeggli (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Marshall Eubanks (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Merike Kaeo (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Sandy Murphy (Feb 19)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Jared Mauch (Feb 19)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Leo Bicknell (Feb 19)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 19)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Marshall Eubanks (Feb 19)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 19)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Sandy Murphy (Feb 19)

(Thread continues...)