nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Confusion


From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:50:54 +0900

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009, Nathan Ward wrote:

Yep. You asked your vendors to support equivalent IPv6 things at the  
time though, so when you roll out IPv6 the support is ready, right?

The point is that these deficiencies exist in IPv4, and I'm not sure  
how you would solve them in IPv6 (assuming you can make all the  
changes you want, and get instant industry-wide support) any better  
than you solve them in IPv4.

Who says the IPv6 solutions need to be better than IPv4?



Adrian



Current thread: