nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Confusion


From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:55:15 +0900

 This may be where Randy Bush derives his "IVTF"  label.

not exactly.  see <http://archive.psg.com/051000.ccr-ivtf.pdf>.

Yes, there have been attempts to bridge the two camps, but I suspect  
the only way to really address this is a fundamental shift in the way  
the IETF does business, taking into account the fact that network  
operators and end users, by and large, are not the implementors of  
protocols and don't actually care how they are implemented, but rather  
the folks who define what the protocols need to do.  I'll admit some  
skepticism that such a change is actually feasible.

standards bodies used to be composed of users meeting to drive vendors
to common specs so the users had freedom of choice and inter-operation.
the ietf has become vendors inventing new and ever more complex features
to drive users to minimal margins.

randy


Current thread: