nanog mailing list archives
Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:03:20 -0800
JF Mezei wrote:
Northern communities in Canada's arctic rely exclusively on satellite for voice/data. Not a lot of data flowing comparatively, but it is their only option so it is more of a "mission critical" thing than a backup.
Also high latitudes are problematic as far as your link budget to geostationary satellites goes in the first place. Switching to an alternative satellite in the event of a failure may be more challenging as a result.
Current thread:
- Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Kevin . Smith (Jan 06)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Simon Lockhart (Jan 06)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 06)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Paul Donner (Jan 06)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Sean Donelan (Jan 06)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Paul Donner (Jan 06)
- RE: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Frank Bulk (Jan 07)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Paul Donner (Jan 06)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Joel Jaeggli (Jan 06)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Joe Abley (Jan 07)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Marshall Eubanks (Jan 07)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Marshall Eubanks (Jan 07)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic sthaug (Jan 07)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Bill Stewart (Jan 07)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Bjørn Mork (Jan 08)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Marshall Eubanks (Jan 08)