nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers
From: Antonio Querubin <tony () lava net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:59:56 -1000 (HST)
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Jay Nakamura wrote:
We are getting an Ethernet DIA circuit from AT&T but they insist that they can't BGP peer with 2 routers on our side. The WAN circuit can only have /30 they say. Has anyone been able to successfully talk them in to bending their rule? If so, how?
Sounds odd. They do IPv6 tunnels using 2 tunnels/routers. The /30 reason is even more odd for an ethernet circuit.
Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN
Current thread:
- AT&T and having two BGP peers Jay Nakamura (Jul 10)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 10)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Antonio Querubin (Jul 10)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Alex H. Ryu (Jul 10)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Stephen Kratzer (Jul 13)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Jay Nakamura (Jul 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Warren Bailey (Jul 10)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Bret Clark (Jul 10)
- RE: AT&T and having two BGP peers Paul Stewart (Jul 10)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Bret Clark (Jul 10)
- RE: AT&T and having two BGP peers Carlos Alcantar (Jul 10)