nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers
From: "Warren Bailey" <wbailey () gci com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:23:23 -0800
Threaten to twitter about it. Worked for the guy on myth busters.. ;) ----- Original Message ----- From: Jay Nakamura <zeusdadog () gmail com> To: nanog () merit edu <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Fri Jul 10 09:48:15 2009 Subject: AT&T and having two BGP peers We are getting an Ethernet DIA circuit from AT&T but they insist that they can't BGP peer with 2 routers on our side. The WAN circuit can only have /30 they say. Has anyone been able to successfully talk them in to bending their rule? If so, how? I know this should have been negotiated before signing a contract but I was unfortunately not in the loop... :( It seems like a ridiculous bureaucratic restriction.
Current thread:
- AT&T and having two BGP peers Jay Nakamura (Jul 10)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 10)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Antonio Querubin (Jul 10)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Alex H. Ryu (Jul 10)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Stephen Kratzer (Jul 13)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Jay Nakamura (Jul 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Warren Bailey (Jul 10)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Bret Clark (Jul 10)
- RE: AT&T and having two BGP peers Paul Stewart (Jul 10)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Bret Clark (Jul 10)
- RE: AT&T and having two BGP peers Carlos Alcantar (Jul 10)