nanog mailing list archives

Re: Point to Point Ethernet


From: Brian Raaen <braaen () zcorum com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:46:48 -0400

Hate to say it, but also some of the cost on the circuits can be blamed
on uncle Sam. ATM circuits are currently tariffed that same way are
voice circuits. These tariffs are not charged to Ethernet because it is
a 'data circuit'. At least that was the case a little while back.

-- 
-----------------
Brian Raaen
Network Engineer
email: /braaen () zcorum com/ <mailto:braaen () zcorum com>
//

Seth Mattinen wrote:
Chris Adams wrote:
  
Once upon a time, Ricky Beam <jfbeam () gmail com> said:
    
Ethernet is cheap because it's everywhere, and built into almost  
everything. (however, the likes of Cisco and Juniper still charge insane  
amounts for line cards, be they ethernet, T1, or OC48.) Given the choice  
of buying a $4k DS3 card or just plugging into an existing, builtin  
ethernet port, which do you think most people will choose?
      
Also, if you are plugging in a lower-speed link, you can plug ethernet
in a <$1000 switch and trunk it to a router, while a mux for T1/T3/OCx
circuits costs a lot more.

    

I just ordered a circuit to be delivered over Ethernet - Verizon just
plugged a pair of STM-1's into an ISG5100 and it's suddenly ridiculously
cheaper.

~Seth

  

Attachment: braaen.vcf
Description:


Current thread: