nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.
From: "Larry May" <lmay () nframe com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:35:55 -0400
We purchased one 7609 for deployment of transit BGP...it doesn't come close to the performance of a GSR w/PRP2's. Extremely high CPU useage on the 7609 with each BGP session... But on the 6509's...it does fine... Larry May Network Services n|Frame 888-223-8633
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router., (continued)
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. Roland Dobbins (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. Roland Dobbins (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 18)
- Message not available
- What Platform for a small ISP (was: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router) R. Benjamin Kessler (Jul 22)
- Re: What Platform for a small ISP (was: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router) Jim Wininger (Jul 22)
- Re: What Platform for a small ISP (was: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router) Manu Chao (Jul 22)
- RE: What Platform for a small ISP (was: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router) R. Benjamin Kessler (Jul 22)
- Re: What Platform for a small ISP (was: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router) David Storandt (Jul 22)
- Re: What Platform for a small ISP (was: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router) Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 22)
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. Saku Ytti (Jul 18)