nanog mailing list archives

Re: Ahoy, SLA boffins!


From: William Herrin <herrin-nanog () dirtside com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:38:18 -0400

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 4:19 PM, JC Dill<jcdill.lists () gmail com> wrote:
William Herrin wrote:
The SLA's I've looked at promise me that if their service is hard down
for a week (with no ambiguity whatsoever) they'll credit my bill for
upwards of 2% of the $50k/year or so I spend on the Internet
connection for my mutli-million dollar online service.

An SLA comes into play when a service is degraded below the quality you
contracted for.  What credit do they give you when you have 168 hours of
degraded service, e.g. 50% of the service level you specified in your RFQ?
 That's where your SLA comes in.  The SLA specifies at what point your
service is considered "degraded" (how much below the contracted service
level, and how long of a time period is required before it is considered
below grade) and what $credit you may receive when you are provided some
service, but not to the level specified in your contract.

Hi JC,

Perhaps you miss my point: what the ISP is offering to pay me as a
result of a failure to deliver adequate service is so much less than
my loss for the same as to render the payment meaningless. I'm gonna
terminate the contract for nonperformance and hire someone who can get
the job done long before its worth my time to chase you for an
SLA-based service credit. And we both know it. The only way I ever
chase you for an SLA credit is I'm playing the blame game instead of
doing my job for my customers.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004


Current thread: