nanog mailing list archives
Re: tor
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:20:11 +0530
Running what's effectively an anonymous open proxy is not a bright idea, even if there's security bundled on.. John Gilmore found that out after Verio disconnected his perpetual open relay for example .. and TOR is just as nutty a concept. Nothing less that I'd expect from the EFF, frankly speaking - but clued people (and you are clued, for sure) shouldnt be running it. There was that other fun when that swedish researcher was running a fake tor exit node and turned up lots of embassy passwords etc - mostly because embassy staffers found TOR a fun way to browse for porn, bypassing firewalls from their offices Uninstall it and forget about it, I'd say. --srs On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Randy Bush<randy () psg com> wrote:
sadly, naively turning up tor to help folk who wish to be anonymous in hard times gets one a lot of assertive email from self-important people who wear formal clothes. folk who learn this the hard way may find a pointer passed to me by smb helpful, <http://www.chrisbrunner.com/?p=119>. randy
-- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: common carriers, was tor, (continued)
- Re: common carriers, was tor John Levine (Jun 25)
- Re: tor Jack Bates (Jun 25)
- RE: [SPAM-HEADER] - Re: tor - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME TO: fields in the email addresses Rod Beck (Jun 25)
- Re: tor Jamon Camisso (Jun 24)
- RE: tor Steve Pirk (Jun 24)
- Re: tor nancyp (Jun 25)
- Message not available
- Re: common carier nancyp (Jun 25)
- Re: tor Randy Bush (Jun 25)
- Re: tor Charles Wyble (Jun 24)