nanog mailing list archives

Re: tor


From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:20:11 +0530

Running what's effectively an anonymous open proxy is not a bright
idea, even if there's security bundled on..

John Gilmore found that out after Verio disconnected his perpetual
open relay for example ..  and TOR is just as nutty a concept.

Nothing less that I'd expect from the EFF, frankly speaking - but
clued people (and you are clued, for sure) shouldnt be running it.

There was that other fun when that swedish researcher was running a
fake tor exit node and turned up lots of embassy passwords etc -
mostly because embassy staffers found TOR a fun way to browse for
porn, bypassing firewalls from their offices

Uninstall it and forget about it, I'd say.

--srs

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Randy Bush<randy () psg com> wrote:
sadly, naively turning up tor to help folk who wish to be anonymous in
hard times gets one a lot of assertive email from self-important people
who wear formal clothes.

folk who learn this the hard way may find a pointer passed to me by smb
helpful, <http://www.chrisbrunner.com/?p=119>.

randy





-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)


Current thread: