nanog mailing list archives

Re: tor


From: Joe Greco <jgreco () ns sol net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:38:57 -0500 (CDT)

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Aaron Porter<atporter () gmail com> wrote:
Would you feel better if instead of "Tor" it was called "Crowds" and
instead of those rapscallions at the EFF it was a nice respectable
AT&T Research project from Avi Ruben? I bet I still have my "Anonymity
Loves Company" shirt somewhere... Anonymous speech is a vital concept
if you expect Free speech.

... as long as it doesnt get abused, yes.  When it gets so that the
volume of abuse gets far higher than the volume of use, they go the
way of all those anon remailers (nym.alias.net and othes)

And while we are at listing research projects .. there are multiple
other great projects around - from the berkman center and elsewhere,
that do much the same.

Only - they're targeted at specific repressive regimes - even
customized to them.

And which one is targetted at the specific repressive regime effectively
created by the US broadband cartels?  :-)

.. JG
-- 
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
"We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I
won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN)
With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.


Current thread: