nanog mailing list archives
Re: Akamai wierdness
From: JC Dill <jcdill.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:08:45 -0700
Paul Wall wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Paul Wall <pauldotwall () gmail com> wrote:I would end the email there, but it really gets me how someone that is in-house doesn't realize that noc@akamai is a black hole.I am pleased hear that Akamai has remedied this situation, most likely by having Mr. Gilmore attend to the matter personally.
The reply I received came from someone who works in the NOC, not from Patrick (who doesn't work in the NOC).
It's really poor form to make these unfounded assertions without any basis for them.
jc
Current thread:
- Akamai wierdness John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Mar 22)
- RE: Akamai wierdness Paul Stewart (Mar 22)
- Re: Akamai wierdness John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Mar 22)
- Re: Akamai wierdness Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 22)
- Re: Akamai wierdness Paul Wall (Mar 23)
- Re: Akamai wierdness JC Dill (Mar 23)
- RE: Akamai wierdness Paul Stewart (Mar 23)
- Re: Akamai wierdness Charles Wyble (Mar 23)
- Re: Akamai wierdness John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Mar 22)
- Re: Akamai wierdness Paul Wall (Mar 23)
- Re: Akamai wierdness JC Dill (Mar 24)
- Re: Akamai wierdness Paul Wall (Mar 24)
- Re: Akamai wierdness jamie rishaw (Mar 24)
- Re: Akamai wierdness JC Dill (Mar 24)
- RE: Akamai wierdness Paul Stewart (Mar 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Akamai wierdness Jeffrey Cohen (Mar 25)
- Re: Akamai wierdness JC Dill (Mar 25)