nanog mailing list archives

Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]

From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 13:18:30 -0700

Owen DeLong wrote:

While you're at it, it would be nice if SPRINT also fixed the problems
with ports TCP/25 and TCP/587.


Never tried 25, but I know 587 is fine through a tethered handset my
(extremely non-technical) significant other uses daily. Shouldn't we all
be using the submission port anyway? ;)

~Seth

Current thread:

another brick in the wall[ed garden] Robert E. Seastrom (May 14)
- Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Owen DeLong (May 14)
  - Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Robert E. Seastrom (May 14)
  - Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Seth Mattinen (May 14)
- you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] John Levine (May 14)
  - RE: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Dave Larter (May 14)
    - Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Marshall Eubanks (May 14)
  - Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Mark Andrews (May 14)
    - RE: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Tomas L. Byrnes (May 14)
    - Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Mark Andrews (May 14)
    - Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Patrick W. Gilmore (May 16)
    - Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] George Imburgia (May 17)
    - Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Patrick W. Gilmore (May 17)
    - Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Andre Gironda (May 14)

(Thread continues...)