nanog mailing list archives
Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]
From: Andre Gironda <andre () operations net>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:25:53 -0700
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews () isc org> wrote:
If I were an ISP, and I knew that approximately 99.9% of customer queries to random name servers was malware doing fake site phishing or misconfigured PCs that will work OK and avoid a support call if they answer the DNS query, with 0.1% being old weenies like us, I'd do what Sprint's doing, too.And what's the next protocol that is going to be stomped on?
I was going to say, "will the ISP also remove the DNS MITM the day that 99.9% of malware moves its command-and-control to the HTTP or other layer?". I figured why bother - but your point drives it home even further. dre
Current thread:
- Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden], (continued)
- Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Seth Mattinen (May 14)
- you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] John Levine (May 14)
- RE: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Dave Larter (May 14)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Marshall Eubanks (May 14)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Mark Andrews (May 14)
- RE: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Tomas L. Byrnes (May 14)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Mark Andrews (May 14)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Patrick W. Gilmore (May 16)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] George Imburgia (May 17)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Patrick W. Gilmore (May 17)
- RE: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Dave Larter (May 14)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Andre Gironda (May 14)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Mans Nilsson (May 14)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] John R. Levine (May 15)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Mans Nilsson (May 15)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Owen DeLong (May 15)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Martin Hannigan (May 15)
- Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Andrew D Kirch (May 14)
- Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Robert E. Seastrom (May 15)