nanog mailing list archives

Re: MX Record Theories

From: gb10hkzo-nanog () yahoo co uk
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 06:48:39 -0700 (PDT)


Mark,

A EDNS referral from the root servers to the COM servers
already exceeded 512 bytes.  The world hasn't fallen over.


Actually, I was thinking to myself yesterday that the email world is going to be awfully
fun when IPv6 sets in and we're all running mail servers with nice long AAAA records such as
fc00:836b:4917::a180:4179.

:)

Current thread:

MX Record Theories gb10hkzo-nanog (May 26)
- Re: MX Record Theories Alex H. Ryu (May 26)
- Re: MX Record Theories Valdis . Kletnieks (May 26)
  - Re: MX Record Theories Mark Andrews (May 26)
  - Re: MX Record Theories Bobby Mac (May 28)
    - Re: MX Record Theories David Conrad (May 28)
    - Re: MX Record Theories Mark Andrews (May 28)
- Re: MX Record Theories William Herrin (May 26)
- Message not available
  - Re: MX Record Theories gb10hkzo-nanog (May 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: MX Record Theories gb10hkzo-nanog (May 27)
  - Message not available
    - Re: MX Record Theories gb10hkzo-nanog (May 28)