nanog mailing list archives
Re: White House net security paper
From: Andrew Euell <andyzweb () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:33:31 -0400
"The Nation’s approach to cybersecurity over the past 15 years has failed to keep pace with the threat." I think that they may be getting it... On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:41 PM, <bmanning () vacation karoshi com> wrote:
fine piece of work. On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:37:58AM -0500, jamie rishaw wrote:The White House just put out a release on net security[1] - at firstglancea mission/vision/values paper, the release page[2] also containing ashortvideo[3]. At first glance, this looks promising - anyone else get a chance to read/review? Comments? -jamie [1] http://www.whitehouse.gov/asset.aspx?AssetId=1732 [2] http://www.whitehouse.gov/CyberReview/ (other links here as well) [3]http://www.whitehouse.gov/videos/2009/May/20090529_Cyber_Security.mp4-- Jamie Rishaw // .com.arpa@j <- reverse it. ish. [Impressive C-level Title Here], arpa / arpa labs
-- Andrew Euell andyzweb [at] gmail [dot] com
Current thread:
- White House net security paper jamie rishaw (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper bmanning (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Andrew Euell (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Jared Mauch (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Andrew Euell (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper marcin (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Andrew Euell (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Sean Donelan (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Randy Bush (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Adrian Chadd (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Randy Bush (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Paul Vixie (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Sean Donelan (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper bmanning (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Barney Wolff (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Paul Vixie (May 31)