nanog mailing list archives
Re: White House net security paper
From: Barney Wolff <barney () databus com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 23:29:59 -0400
Any organization moaning about unfilled slots is welcome to raise its salary scale, and fill them. All such whining is really an implicit statement that the job is not vital enough to fill. Funny, you never hear complaints about being unable to fill CEO slots, or bond traders. On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 10:54:40PM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
Its not the quality, its the quantity. Two new grads are great, but over the next 10 years some estimates (yeah, I know about statistics) say there will be a gap of over 100,000 new IT Security jobs to fill in the US and close to a million unfilled positions world-wide. How many ISPs have too many network security people?
-- Barney Wolff I never met a computer I didn't like.
Current thread:
- Re: White House net security paper, (continued)
- Re: White House net security paper bmanning (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Andrew Euell (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Jared Mauch (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Andrew Euell (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper marcin (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Andrew Euell (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Sean Donelan (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Randy Bush (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Adrian Chadd (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Randy Bush (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Paul Vixie (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Sean Donelan (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper bmanning (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Barney Wolff (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Paul Vixie (May 31)