nanog mailing list archives
RE: What DNS Is Not
From: "Buhrmaster, Gary" <gtb () slac stanford edu>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:52:35 -0800
-----Original Message----- From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com [mailto:bmanning () vacation karoshi com] Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 4:32 PM To: Patrick W. Gilmore Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: What DNS Is Not
...
notbeing Paul, its rude of me to respond - yet you posted this to a public list ... so here goes. Why do you find your behaviour in your domains acceptable and yet the same behaviour in others zones to be "a Bad Thing" and should be stopped?
Ok, devils advocate argument. Is there is a difference between being a domain "owner" (Patrick wanting to wildcard the domain he has paid for), and a domain "custodian" (Verisign for the .com example) in whether wildcards are ever acceptable in the DNS responses you provide?
Current thread:
- Re: What DNS Is Not, (continued)
- Re: What DNS Is Not David Ulevitch (Nov 10)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Stephane Bortzmeyer (Nov 10)
- Re: What DNS Is Not sthaug (Nov 10)
- Re: What DNS Is Not David Ulevitch (Nov 10)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Jack Bates (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Kevin Oberman (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Paul Vixie (Nov 12)
- RE: What DNS Is Not Warren Bailey (Nov 12)
- Re: What DNS Is Not bmanning (Nov 09)
- RE: What DNS Is Not Buhrmaster, Gary (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not David Andersen (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not bmanning (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Edward Lewis (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Jorge Amodio (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Martin Hannigan (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not bmanning (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Jorge Amodio (Nov 08)