nanog mailing list archives
Re: Failover how much complexity will it add?
From: Brad Fleming <bdfleming () kanren net>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:28:45 -0600
I would have thought that this lesson would still be fresh in the minds of people, as we just passed 256K routes a little while ago and broke a whole bunch of Catalyst 6500/7600 SUP720-3B's (etc). I guess the pain isn't as memorable as I thought.
Not all of us forgot... I remember the day our 7606's filled and started trying to software switch. Was a painful day indeed. At least we knew it was coming.. just couldn't do anything about it due to budgets.
Current thread:
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add?, (continued)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Joe Greco (Nov 09)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? adel (Nov 09)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Seth Mattinen (Nov 09)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Stef Walter (Nov 10)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Joel Jaeggli (Nov 10)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Randy Bush (Nov 10)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Joel Jaeggli (Nov 12)
- RE: Failover how much complexity will it add? Holmes,David A (Nov 09)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Joe Greco (Nov 09)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Brad Fleming (Nov 10)