nanog mailing list archives
Re: Failover how much complexity will it add?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:29:51 +0900
It has been routinely observed in nanog presentations that settlement free providers by their nature miss a few prefixes that well connected transit purchasing ISPs carry.
just trying to understand what you mean, o no transit-free provider actually has all (covering) prefixes needed to cover the active space, but o one or more reasonably small subsets of the set of transit-free providers do cover the whole active space. randy
Current thread:
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add?, (continued)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? adel (Nov 09)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Joe Greco (Nov 09)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? adel (Nov 09)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? adel (Nov 09)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? adel (Nov 09)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Joe Greco (Nov 09)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? adel (Nov 09)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Seth Mattinen (Nov 09)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Stef Walter (Nov 10)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Joel Jaeggli (Nov 10)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Randy Bush (Nov 10)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Joel Jaeggli (Nov 12)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? adel (Nov 09)
- RE: Failover how much complexity will it add? Holmes,David A (Nov 09)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Joe Greco (Nov 09)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Brad Fleming (Nov 10)