nanog mailing list archives

Re: Upstream BGP community support


From: "Andy B." <globichen () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:16:08 +0100

On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> wrote:
But seriously now, the reason we have these squishy things taking up
space between our ears in the first place is so we can come up with new
ideas and better ways to solve our problems. Obviously you can take it
too far, I'm sure we've all seen examples of absurdly over-complicated
designs which existed only for the edification of someone's ego, but I
have never seen a intelligent and well thought out BGP community system
do anything other than make everyone's life easier. I don't know who
these people are who you claim are busy breaking things with
communities, but I've never seen them. Being clever is a good thing when
it helps you find new ways to do more with less, and those who can't
innovate in this industry are dooming themselves to obsolescence.

That being said, how can we (me, my company, nanog, ...) possibly do
to convince someone like HE, who wants to be a global player, to
support BGP communities?
I'm not that good at baking cakes, but HE seems to be doing pretty well at that.
I know that some engineers from HE are in this list; maybe they can
give us some insight as to why they believe communities are worthless.

Andy


Current thread: