Re: ISP customer assignments

[Dave Temkin <davet1 () gmail com>]

Nathan Ward wrote:
> On 16/10/2009, at 1:17 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> > Is there any good solution to this?  I don't expect us to fill the /32
> > to justify expanding it (although I do see ARIN appears to have left
> > space for up to a /29; I guess that's their sparse allocation policy?).
>
> Your justification is that you have two sites without a guaranteed 
> link between them.
>
> This is a bit annoying though, yeah. But, I'm not sure I can think of 
> a good solution that doesn't involve us changing the routing system so 
> that we can handle a huge amount of intentional de-aggregates or 
> something.
>
> --
> Nathan Ward
Actually, as of right now that's not justification.  The Multiple 
Discrete Networks policy that's up for a vote in Dearborn will allow for 
this, but right now there's no IPv6 equivalent of that policy.

-Dave