nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:30:41 +0000
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:20:11PM +1100, Karl Auer wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:40 +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:If, on the other hand, the REAL desire is to have a DHCP server break the tie in the selection between several routers that advertise their presence, that wouldn't be unreasonable.The RA contains a preference level... maybe that doesn't cut it if multiple routers are sending the same preference level, but presumably that would not happen in a well-tended network.
I point you to a fairly common Internet architecture artifact, the exchange point... dozens of routers sharing a common media for peering exchange.
Regards, K.
--bill
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Chris Adams (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Ray Soucy (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Owen DeLong (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN David Barak (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Owen DeLong (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Owen DeLong (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Karl Auer (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN bmanning (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Karl Auer (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN bmanning (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Karl Auer (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN bmanning (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Karl Auer (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Nick Hilliard (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN bmanning (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Nick Hilliard (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN sthaug (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Mohacsi Janos (Oct 22)