nanog mailing list archives

Re: Edu versus Speakeasy Speedtest


From: Robert Enger - NANOG <nanog () enger us>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:31:25 -0700

 1) The capacity that a campus has into I2 or NLR is different than the BW the campus purchases from their commercial 
provider(s).
2) The commercial BW test sites are not optimized for speed.  They do not have unlimited capacity network connections.  
And, they have not tuned their network stack for HS operation: notably, their OS will impose memory limits on the 
socket / transmit-buffer pool; so even if a receiver advertises a big window, frequently the transmitter (speed test 
server) will never queue enough data to fill the pipe
3) Peering capacity is not what it should be into the networks used by some of the BW test sites.



On 4/29/2010 8:53 AM, Murphy, William wrote:
I work for an Edu with multi-gigabit Internet connectivity and I get
questions from users saying "Why am I only getting 14Mb when I run this
speed test?"  I have got to believe that the various Internet speed tests
(Speakeasy or dslreports) are rate limited to prevent someone from shutting
them down.  I am able to get 300-400Mb running from a PC inside my network
to NDT servers located on Internet2, so that tells me my border and internal
network is healthy.  Can someone on this list shed some light regarding
reliability and accuracy of these various speed tests especially for an Edu
with lots'o bandwidth?  Thanks.



Bill Murphy

University of Texas Health Science Center - Houston






Current thread: