nanog mailing list archives
Re: net-neutrality
From: William Pitcock <nenolod () systeminplace net>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:09:13 -0500
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 11:25 +0000, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:
it is: c) RIAA/MPAA members trying to make ISPs liable for what customers do in order to somehow fork the isp into kicking out the customer, as they refuse to simply go to court against the customer but rather prefer to harrass their ISP or their isp's isp..
did you stop taking your medication today? net-neutrality has nothing to do with following the law. if you do not like the copyright enforcement law in the netherlands, then change the law in the netherlands. nanog is not your soapbox, and I for one, am tired of hearing about how you host thepiratebay (which is, for the last few years at least, a pretty shitty torrent tracker anyway). so please, for the love of $deity, stop posting your crap to this list. by the way, you're still invited to provide a list of legitimate (e.g. not warez) customers you have. i'm pretty sure that you do not have any though. william
Current thread:
- net-neutrality Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Mark Smith (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality William Pitcock (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Mark Smith (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality William Pitcock (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Chris Fuenty (Aug 11)