nanog mailing list archives
Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers
From: "Daryl G. Jurbala" <daryl () introspect net>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 10:53:34 -0400
On Aug 4, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
Le 4 août 2010 à 15:14, Mirko Maffioli a écrit :2010/7/25 Laurens Vets <laurens () daemon be>:Cisco PIX: no, Cisco ASA: yes. It even runs under VMware... It's however very hackish... :)Cisco ASA under VMware?? :|CiscoASA is based on x86, there is no reasons you cannot run this into VMWare or Xen...
If that were the only qualification, PIX builds for the 515s would run under VMWare or XEN as well. Maybe they do, but I've never seen it.
Current thread:
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Mirko Maffioli (Aug 04)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Xavier Beaudouin (Aug 04)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Daryl G. Jurbala (Aug 04)
- RE: Appliance Vs Software based routers Mike Walter (Aug 04)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Greg Whynott (Aug 04)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Daryl G. Jurbala (Aug 04)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Greg Whynott (Aug 04)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Lamar Owen (Aug 05)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Curtis Maurand (Aug 04)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Xavier Beaudouin (Aug 04)