nanog mailing list archives
RE: Appliance Vs Software based routers
From: Mike Walter <mwalter () 3z net>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 10:56:54 -0400
I assume the ASA's don't run natively on VMware or Xen, I assume you have to use something like GNS3. I think that would be fine for testing, but in real world production running an ASA on GNS3 under an another OS seems like a bad idea. I hope Cisco will come out with Virtual Appliances for some of their products like they did for the Nexus 1000V. -Mike -----Original Message----- From: Daryl G. Jurbala [mailto:daryl () introspect net] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 10:54 AM To: Xavier Beaudouin Cc: nanog Subject: Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers On Aug 4, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
Le 4 août 2010 à 15:14, Mirko Maffioli a écrit :2010/7/25 Laurens Vets <laurens () daemon be>:Cisco PIX: no, Cisco ASA: yes. It even runs under VMware... It's however very hackish... :)Cisco ASA under VMware?? :|CiscoASA is based on x86, there is no reasons you cannot run this into VMWare or Xen...
If that were the only qualification, PIX builds for the 515s would run under VMWare or XEN as well. Maybe they do, but I've never seen it.
Current thread:
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Mirko Maffioli (Aug 04)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Xavier Beaudouin (Aug 04)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Daryl G. Jurbala (Aug 04)
- RE: Appliance Vs Software based routers Mike Walter (Aug 04)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Greg Whynott (Aug 04)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Daryl G. Jurbala (Aug 04)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Greg Whynott (Aug 04)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Lamar Owen (Aug 05)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Curtis Maurand (Aug 04)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Xavier Beaudouin (Aug 04)