Re: "potential new and different architectural approach" to solve the Comcast - L3 dispute

[Dave Temkin <davet1 () gmail com>]

Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> BTW, they rejected my very nice comment on their blog asking if they 
> would be willing to share the graphs of their transit provider 
> interfaces (which are NOT peering relationships, and not under NDA) to 
> back up their claims that the published graphs are false, so I'm 
> positive yours isn't going to get through. :)
>
>   
Seems as though, in both this case and Steve's case, Comcast is going 
out of their way to spin as much FUD as they can against those who dare 
speak out and are making a concerted effort to censor their "blog" (ie, 
press release machine).

It's not going unnoticed and I hope they realize that instead of 
commenting on their blog, "we" will turn to the official FCC comment 
process.

-Dave