nanog mailing list archives
Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure
From: gordon b slater <gordslater () ieee org>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:30:36 +0000
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 13:17 -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 11:29 -0700, Brielle Bruns wrote:Isn't the timestamps inserted by syslog rather then the reporting program itself?The syslog message sent to the local unix socket (/dev/log or /dev/syslog) may contain a timestamp, in which case, that timestamp may be used instead of the local time. As the syslog protocol defines that timestamps are localtime, without any specification of what timezone localtime actually is, the TZ environment variable of the application calling syslog() will affect the timestamp placed in the log.
aha! there you go, mine doesn't but maybe yours does? Gord -- tic toc
Current thread:
- Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure, (continued)
- Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure Brielle Bruns (Feb 26)
- Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure Larry Sheldon (Feb 26)
- Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure Wade Peacock (Feb 26)
- Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure gordon b slater (Feb 26)
- Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure Larry Sheldon (Feb 26)
- RE: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure Joe (Feb 26)
- Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure gordon b slater (Feb 26)
- Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure Wade Peacock (Feb 26)
- Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure gordon b slater (Feb 26)
- Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 26)
- Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure William Pitcock (Feb 26)
- Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure gordon b slater (Feb 26)
- Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure William Pitcock (Feb 26)
- Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure Seth Mattinen (Feb 26)
- Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure Wade Peacock (Feb 26)
- Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure Brielle Bruns (Feb 26)