nanog mailing list archives

Re: Spamhaus...


From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:20:01 -0500 (EST)

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, James Hess wrote:

According to the Spamhaus web site,  Your mail volume is automatically
assumed to be very large,  if you use a dedicated anti-spam
server/appliance of any type.     It would appear that the logic is:
"everyone who has a low volume of mail MUST  perform all spam
filtering on the mail server,  and not have any separate machine
dedicated to spam filtering".

If your mail volume is large enough that it made sense to shell out a grand to a few grand for a "spam firewall" and several hundred $ per year for updates, is it wrong for Spamhaus to want you to pay them too (if you want to use their data to improve your spam filtering)?

The yearly fee for small corporate query access (up to a few hundred users) is less than you'd pay for a year of updates on a "spam firewall".

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis                   |  I route
 Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
 Atlantic Net                |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________


Current thread: