nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spamhaus...
From: Michelle Sullivan <matthew () sorbs net>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:08:40 +0100
Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:50:59AM -0800, Crist Clark wrote:And I want to know how they figured out we had a Barracuda.It's not that hard, much of the time -- they tend to make themselves visible via their poor behavior.
Is there some very specific poor behavior you're referring to?
Finally, this discussion should really be on spam-l, not nanog.
Actually considering the original message was addressed to the 'large DNS server operators' this is probably more appropriate. Whether the non-followups in this thread should be there instead is a different issue. Michelle
Current thread:
- Re: Spamhaus..., (continued)
- Re: Spamhaus... Crist Clark (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... William Warren (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Crist Clark (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Larry Sheldon (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... James Hess (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Jon Lewis (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Crist Clark (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Rich Kulawiec (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... Bjørn Mork (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... Rich Kulawiec (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... William Herrin (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... Larry Sheldon (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... William Herrin (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... Randy Bush (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... William Herrin (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... Scott Howard (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... Scott Howard (Feb 19)