nanog mailing list archives
Re: ip address management
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:41:19 +0000
On 03/02/2010 12:51, Andy Davidson wrote:
It looks like the lack of ipv6 support in ipplan is partly due to the maintainer not wanting to support it, so we might be tempted to (if the license permits) fork the project and hack in support.
There is a FAQ entry for ipv6 support in ipplan:
One feature request that comes up from time to time is IPv6. Adding IPv6 support will require major effort but has such a limited audience. Ironically the only people that ever requested IPv6 support are either from Telcos, ISP’s or government departments, yet they are never interested in contributing resources! I deam them parasites of the Open Source world - leaching off the good will and effort of the Open Source community, yet give nothing in return.
q.v. http://iptrack.sourceforge.net/doku.php?id=faq I guess we're all entitled to our opinions. The data model used in ipplan is to enumerate all IP addresses in the working ranges. This works fine for ipv4, but obviously breaks horribly for ipv6. Political considerations aside, I suspect that this is at least some of the reason that ipplan doesn't support it. Nick
Current thread:
- ip address management Pavel Dimow (Feb 02)
- RE: ip address management Scott Berkman (Feb 02)
- Re: ip address management Andy Davidson (Feb 03)
- Re: ip address management Phil Regnauld (Feb 03)
- Re: ip address management Phil Regnauld (Feb 03)
- Re: ip address management Nick Hilliard (Feb 03)
- Re: ip address management Phil Regnauld (Feb 03)
- Re: ip address management Joel Jaeggli (Feb 03)
- Re: ip address management Mark Smith (Feb 03)
- Re: ip address management Cian Brennan (Feb 04)
- Re: ip address management Mark Smith (Feb 04)
- Re: ip address management Andy Davidson (Feb 03)
- RE: ip address management Scott Berkman (Feb 02)
- Re: ip address management Brian R. Watters (Feb 03)
- Re: ip address management Arnd Vehling (Feb 04)