Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links

[Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>]

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Christopher Morrow
<morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Mathias Seiler
> <mathias.seiler () mironet ch> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > In reference to the discussion about /31 for router links, I d'like to know what is your experience with IPv6 in 
> > this regard.
> >
> > I use a /126 if possible but have also configured one /64 just for the link between two routers. This works great 
> > but when I think that I'm wasting 2^64 - 2 addresses here it feels plain wrong.
> >
> > So what do you think? Good? Bad? Ugly? /127 ? ;)
>
> <cough>draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt</cough>
>
> (<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt>)
>
> why not just ping your vendors to support this, and perhaps chime in
> on v6ops about wanting to do something sane with ptp link addressing?
> :)

a kind soul or 2 asked: "How do I sign up for the v6ops mailing list?"
(it's actually the ipv6 wg mailing list)
<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>

should get you there...

-Chris