nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica () juniper net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:50:22 -0500
Chris, Discussion of draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p is on the IETF 6man WG mailing list. But please do chime in. Operator input very welcomed. Ron Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Mathias Seiler <mathias.seiler () mironet ch> wrote:Hi In reference to the discussion about /31 for router links, I d'like to know what is your experience with IPv6 in this regard. I use a /126 if possible but have also configured one /64 just for the link between two routers. This works great but when I think that I'm wasting 2^64 - 2 addresses here it feels plain wrong. So what do you think? Good? Bad? Ugly? /127 ? ;)<cough>draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt</cough> (<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt>) why not just ping your vendors to support this, and perhaps chime in on v6ops about wanting to do something sane with ptp link addressing? :) -Chris
Current thread:
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links, (continued)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Dobbins, Roland (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mark Smith (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links James Hess (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Dobbins, Roland (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links James Hess (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links David Freedman (Jan 25)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Christopher Morrow (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mark Smith (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Christopher Morrow (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Ron Bonica (Jan 26)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Christopher Morrow (Jan 26)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Larry Sheldon (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Brandon Galbraith (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mark Smith (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Owen DeLong (Jan 23)