nanog mailing list archives

Re: Vyatta as a BRAS


From: Truman Boyes <truman () suspicious org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:56:16 +1000


On 13/07/2010, at 4:50 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:


On Jul 13, 2010, at 1:34 PM, Sharef Mustafa wrote:

do you recommend it?


My comment would be that a software-based BRAS - 7200, Vyatta, et. al. - is no longer viable in today's Internet, and 
hasn't been for years, due to security/availability concerns.  Same for peering/transit edge, customer aggregation 
edge, et. al.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

   Injustice is relatively easy to bear; what stings is justice.

                       -- H.L. Mencken

I agree. In a bind I have seen small providers experiment with FreeBSD/Linux L2TP termination (as a LNS), I would 
recommend against it if you have a business that depends upon these customers' happiness. There were all sorts of 
issues to address when the customer ran significant traffic forwarding through the unix boxes, namely adjusting kernel 
parameters for NMB_CLUSTERS, heap sizes, all sorts of sysctl parameters, adding additional interface counts, etc. A low 
cost 7200 or ERX-310 would easily fit the bill, and you can buy them cheap these days. 

Cheers,
Truman




Current thread: