Re: I slogged through it so you don't have to -- ICANN Vertical Integration WG for dummies

[Franck Martin <franck () genius com>]

The question too, is which model is mitigating the best the presence of rogue registrars (like domain tasting 
registrars, etc..)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joly MacFie" <joly () punkcast com>
To: "Eric Brunner-Williams" <brunner () nic-naa net>
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Sent: Tuesday, 27 July, 2010 10:00:03 AM
Subject: Re: I slogged through it so you don't have to -- ICANN Vertical        Integration WG for dummies

I found Milton Mueller's summary - noted at
http://www.isoc-ny.org/p2/?p=1006- useful.

Is there anything there that you would disagree with?

j


On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams
<brunner () nic-naa net> wrote:

> Actually the alliances visible at present are:
>
> JN2 proposal: Verisign, NeuStar, NetSol and eNom and others,
>
> RACK proposal: Afilas, PIR, GoDaddy, and others, including CORE.
>
> I look forward to your public comments, here or at the ICANN comment site.
>
> Eric



-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
 http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
  Secretary - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
---------------------------------------------------------------