nanog mailing list archives

Re: I slogged through it so you don't have to -- ICANN Vertical Integration WG for dummies


From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner () nic-naa net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:22:10 -0400

On 7/26/10 7:50 PM, William Pitcock wrote:
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 14:42 -0400, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
But I do take your point about .co/.com, and in all fairness, it is a
decade delayed favor returned by NeuStar to Verisign for the .bz/.biz
"collaborative marketing" ploy of 2001.

Or eNom's .cc/.com ploy from 1999-present.  Don't you remember the
television ad buy they did on all of the networks?  Rednecks dancing
around playing fiddles singing about ".cc".  On the other hand, at least
they weren't showing soft porn like GoDaddy does.

Sorry, ENOTEEVEE. I'll have to imagine my folks with fiddles singing about a repurposed ccTLD. GoDaddy's advertising use of a NASCAR driver is not quite a "vertical integration" issue.

Could y'all please keep up with the geezer play'n washboard or the boy blow'n jug? Dance, sing or holl'r as you like. Thankee.

Eric


Current thread: